Ấn phẩm:
A Functional Analysis of the 2002 Korean Presidential Debates
Xem mô tả
3
Xem & Tải
0
Nhan đề khác
Tóm tắt
This study applied the Functional Theory of Political Campaign Discourse to the 2002 Korean presidential debates. These messages stressed acclaims (positive statements) more than attacks; defenses were the least common function. Policy (issues) occurred more frequently than character (image). General goals and ideals were used more to acclaim than attack. The incumbent party candidate acclaimed more and attacked less than challenger party candidates (and acclaimed more and attacked less on past deeds in particular). The most common form of defense was simple denial. These results were contrasted with the most recent American presidential debates to reveal similarities and differences between presidential debates in these two cultures.
Tác giả
Cheolhan Lee
William L. Benoit
Người hướng dẫn
Nơi xuất bản
Nhà xuất bản
Taylor & Francis
Năm xuất bản
2005
ISSN tạp chí
Nhan đề tập
Từ khóa chủ đề
Political communication , Presidential debates , South Korea presidential election 2002
